home • about • relationships • teaching • assessment • institutions • theory • events • library
About
We have structured this site to focus on different aspects of belonging and compassion. We begin with relationships as a place to unfold transformative paths. The pages on teaching, assessment and leadership offer a space for deeper reflection on overlapping practices across domains and disciplines to trace connections and construct new knowledges of compassion. The page on theory is where we explore the relational through different theoretical perspectives and we invite you to join us in furthering cultures of belonging through practice sharing, talks and creative happenings on our Events page.
Self-Compassion
Why should we care about belonging?
What is compassion and how does it relate to belonging?
Compassion is a diverse and complex concept with roots in ancient philosophical and religious perspectives. It is a relational process and also a motivation for action. We take Dr Theo Gilbert’s definition of compassion as the noticing of distress to others (and self) and the commitment to taking action to reduce it. This call to action is where we position our work as we encourage educators to nurture belonging by creating conditions that acknowledge structural oppression and reduce their impact on students. This compassionate approach to cultures of belonging through connection has likeness to bell hook’s concept of teaching as caring for the soul of students and Dr Paulo Freire’s pedagogy of love. A sense of belonging can be achieved through the praxis of compassionate pedagogy – by noticing distress and acting to alleviate it, we can show students and staff that they matter.
Myth busting belonging
Through the process of listening and talking with colleagues, we started to bust some of the myths that exist around belonging in higher education. We collectively challenged tacit assumptions and normative practices, to discover opportunities for transformation. In our paper Relational Reflections: How do we nurture belonging in creative Higher Education? We discuss this in more depth. https://journals.staffs.ac.uk/index.php/ipihe/article/view/20
Myth 1: Peer relationships are paramount for belonging
Whilst peer relationships play a fundamental role in student sense of belonging, staff-student relationships are noted by several scholars such as Terrell Strayhorn as being most influential in establishing a sense of belonging, particularly amongst Black students. These staff student relationships have symbolic value, acting as the human interface between the individual and the university.
Myth 2: Extra-curricular social events are a priority in fostering belonging
By focusing on nurturing belonging outside of the core curriculum we may unintentionally deepen inequalities. Extra curricular activities might not be accessible to many students, due to personal responsibilities, financial, cultural or health reasons. Exposing the need for belonging to be primarily nurtured in the classroom, by actively designing socialisation into learning. Reframing belonging as a pedagogic approach, rather than an additional ‘intervention’.
Myth 3: Fostering belonging is about helping students to fit in
Conforming to pre-exiting norms of the Global North is problematic; what are we expecting students to fit into? This projects an opinion onto students of what it mean to belong at university, rather than it being authentically situated within the individual. Bringing with it assumptions about who our students are, their prior experiences, and the value they bring. Rather, belonging is about enabling everyone to bring their authentic selves to their learning.